The Brain-Mind Interface
News & Views In Brain Imaging Research from NeuroImage Inc.
The Brain-Mind Interface

Reliability of Quantitative Diffusion Tensor Tractography

MRI Difussion Tensor Imaging has been used to evaluate for structural brain connectivity lately, a technique that has been traditionally done using pathological methods. DTI is based on water diffusion along the brain fiber tracts. The complexity of the brain fibers is a challenge. In a recent study by Wang YV. et al ( A comprehensive reliability assessment of quantitative diffusion tensor tractography, NeuroImage 2012, 60: 1127-1138); It shows that DTI tractography should be a reliable method in cases where the track size is not too small and in brain regions where the water diffusion directionality is not too low. They showed that a way of improving the reliability and accuracy is by increasing the number of gradient directions and by scan repetition. They based these conclusions by retesting and evaluating for inter and intra reliability.

It would be interesting, in my opinion, to compare this method with known pathological techniques.

Adolfo Cotter

Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography (MREIT)

This is a relatively new technology in development that is based on injecting current through surface electrodes into the human body. This current will induce a magnetic flux that relates to the conductivity of the tissue. MRI will then capture this magnetic flux. This technology shows a high resolution within a few millimetres. The SNR (signal to noise ratio) issue still has to be resolved.

I find this technology very interesting as an adjunct to EEG. During EEG the electrical activity of the brain is captured at the surface of the scalp. Differences in brain conductivity can alter the EEG recordings. MREIT can help refine EEG source localization by giving information on the brain conductivity by region. Also MREIT could be useful to help understand better the mechanisms behind EEG recordings.

An interesting paper on this topic is the following:

Minhas AS, et al. Experimental Performance Evaluation of Multi-Echo ICNE Pulse Sequence in Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2011) 66: 957-865

Adolfo Cotter

Susceptibility Tensor Imaging (STI)

STI is a new MRI technology in development. It consists on creating images and contrast based on the susceptibility of the tissue to the magnetic field. This susceptibility seems to be based to the anisotropic alignment of the molecules. The tissue is more susceptible when the angle to the magnetic field is smaller. A recent study in mouse, (Chunlei L. et al. 3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging. NeuroImage (2012) 59: 1290-1298), shows a similar contrast to Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), although DTI seems to be superior in small and complex fibers.

It would be interesting to compare STI to neuroanatomical tract tracing, since pathology is still the gold standard. This is a new technology that needs more development although the initial results look promising.

Adolfo Cotter

Do experiments really help us understand reality better?

The experimental approach was introduced many years ago with the goal of factual analysis of reality based on testing and gathering data from nature. For this purpose we use our senses to gather information from reality. There has been a debate if what we sense is real or distorted by our emotions, experiences, thoughts, feelings etc. Dr. Steven Pinker discusses this topic in his book “The Blank Slate” for example.

The question I have is if experiments and gathering information from reality with our senses is better than just logical reasoning and thinking. Apparently it is, but I think we have to analyze this situation better using our current knowledge of Neuroscience and Imaging, for example, in order to arrive to a more definite conclusion. We might be surprised.

Adolfo Cotter

Too Good to be True...

You hear it often: “that’s too good to be true.” A long list of hucksters and criminals have used the method of offering exceptionally good opportunities in order to steal peoples’ money in the past, and so our society does not believe in fantastic opportunities anymore. This is very sad and dangerous for true and generous people who are now usually mistaken for being liars and criminals whenever they might “go too far” in presenting the virtues of an opportunity. In other words, true criminals who have been using this method, not only have committed the criminal act, but have deeply hurt our society by not allowing truly exceptional people to prosper. This in consequence has diminished the number of real outstanding opportunities.

At NeuroImage we thrive to provide exceptional service. We do hope our clients will not think about us as “Too good to be true…!”

Adolfo Cotter

Argument vs. Diplomacy

As I mentioned in my previous blog, the current scientific method requires rigorousness and precision. In order to achieve those objectives, scientific argument is essential. My observations tell me that scientific argument has been progressively displaced by diplomacy. In our society many scientists do not like too much argument taking this more like a personal attack. Especially if a junior scientist argues with a senior one, many times he or she can be in trouble. The solution people take usually is to be diplomatic so to survive the race. This is very dangerous to science, and scientists who avoid argument should be penalized.

Adolfo Cotter

Utility of the Scientific Method

During my observations, I realize that many occurrences in nature and life do not appear to obey scientific logic. Some of those occurrences are for example: human behavior, human relationships, life and death,spirituality, natural disasters, etc. On the other hand there are processes that do obey this logic. In my opinion the rigorous and precise scientific method should be better applicable to the processes that obey this logic. Examples of this can be the development of medications, medical devices, the study of the physics of imaging, etc.

Saying this, I believe we should find new methods that can be more suitable for the other elements of nature.

Adolfo Cotter

The Instant Information Age Should Transform The Way We Learn And Educate

Today, very large amounts and varieties of data are instantly available to any budding scientist or clinician, more and more so even on mobile devices. While this can sometimes be overwhelming and as I mentioned in my previous blog, too much knowledge can be counterproductive for creativity, there is an upside to this “information overload” that represents an educational opportunity.

With so much data so readily available, the training of new professionals can now emphasize “understanding" the concepts and the inner structure of the field of study, learning how to look at the information critically, and learning how to think. Also, a very good knowledge on how to use the new technology is crucial.

While too much information bombarding our minds is not fertile ground for creativity, if we learn to use the technology properly, it allows our brains to be more creative and even more efficient. This could be a big step forward in how well we learn. I think our educational system should adapt to this new change.

Adolfo Cotter

Neurology and Legal Medicine

I find this combination of specialties fascinating.

In my opinion, Neurology has been, and still is in large part a diagnostic specialty, whereas the main goal of medicine is to resolve patients’ clinical problems. Hopefully with more R&D, neurological treatment will become more useful. Unfortunately, up until now where the practice of Neurology has been used to affect clinical outcomes, practitioners and patients are often hampered by unacceptable medication adverse event profiles to achieve symptomatic relief, and outright cures are seldom achieved. This is why Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology R&D in this area is crucial and is thankfully now moving forward faster than ever before.

In the meantime, combining neurological knowledge and diagnosis with a discipline such as legal medicine for example would allow physicians in this field to be more useful to their patients. In this context, neurologists who otherwise are not surgeons would be able to diagnose illnesses and use their legal tools to help patients better. For example, what about using their expertise to help patients get insurance benefits or resolve medico-legal or medical malpractice issues? Ideally this could be combined with the practice of Neurology itself. I encourage neurologists to take a look at The American Board of Legal Medicine web site, www.ablminc.org/index.htm, and the American College of Legal Medicine web site at www.aclm.org

Adolfo Cotter

Transcranial Doppler (TCD)

TCD is the only non-invasive real-time neuroimaging study that can evaluate the characteristics of cerebral blood flow continuously. CT Angiography (CTA) and Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) can do snapshots in time. Fluoroscopic angiography is the gold standard and can be used as a confirmatory tool.

Some of the applications of TCD are: stroke, vasomotor reactivity testing, emboli monitoring, shunt detection, increased intracranial pressure, circulatory arrest, monitoring vasospasm after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage, and sickle cell anemia.

In my opinion TCD can be a good test in the assessment of brain death when the diagnosis is doubtful.

A good review paper in this topic is the following:

Tsivgoulis G, et al, Advances in Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2009, 9:46-54

Adolfo Cotter

Blog Software
Blog Software